Einfach nur genial! Danke für den Link!

Da könnte man ja bald eine Sammlungsthread machen?

Zitat

---

When Eddie Izzard was asked why he wears women’s clothing, he responded: “They’re not women’s clothes. They’re my clothes. I bought them.” In his answer, gender of the owner becomes irrelevant, only the capability or male entitlement to own things (i.e. his property rights – “my clothes”) is important.

---

Zitat

---

Straight women, who believe in traditional gender norms, which also includes the “rule” that men should only wear masculine clothing (no heels! no make-up! nothing that resembles my gender!), will or cannot understand/allow a sartorial “feminization” of straight men. Straight men in women’s clothing (not as drag queens) represent a threat to women’s femininity despite the growing trend and benefits of gender fluidity. If straight men are feminine, what is left for straight women? I would say anything – feminine, masculine, androgynous, genderfuck, genderless, genderqueer fashion. This outdated belief about sartorial binarism (masculine VS feminine) is a result of the myth that only “opposites attract”. What can possibly flourish, when there is nothing in common …To conclude: when straight men cave into their sartorial choices without being ridiculed with homophobic or ableist comments (gender ? sexuality, wardrobe ? deviation) and if those choices will consist of what is now regarded as “feminine attire”, a progress towards more gender-free or at least genderfuck society can happen.

---